Not Just a Personal Pentecost Leadership

Not Just a Personal Pentecost: The Spirit’s Call to Social Action

JOSEPH LEE DUTKO


The Tension: Saving Souls or Serving Society?

            Throughout its history, the church has wrestled with the tension between evangelistic outreach and social action.[1] One extreme is a disembodied and dualistic spirituality that equates the world with evil, seeks to escape it, and rejoices in its apocalyptic doom. In this scenario, our mission is simply to save as many souls as possible before Jesus returns. The other extreme is a social gospel that sees the church’s only mission as making this world a better place. The former makes the world irrelevant; the latter makes spiritual life irrelevant. So which is it? Is our primary mission to save souls or to serve society? Thankfully, nowhere in the Bible, early Pentecostal history, or thoughtful Pentecostal theology do we find this kind of dichotomy. Rather, these three areas clearly teach a holistic model of evangelism that highlights the multidimensionality of salvation and the Spirit’s role in it.

The work of the Spirit involves the transformation of both human beings and all creation through personal salvation and social action.[2] Therefore, debating whether our missional priorities should be weighted more towards evangelism or social concern makes no sense—they are an integrated whole, and we cannot fulfil our mission without both. Because of the tendency within Pentecostalism to emphasize “soul-winning” at the expense of social action, this article will primarily focus on mission through social action in an attempt to bring a more balanced and integrated approach that is closer to our Pentecostal origins. It is my contention that our Pentecostal beliefs—informed by the Bible, history and theology—call us to Pentecostal practices that integrate the Spirit’s work in souls and society, evangelism and social action, and worship and mission.

 

Bible: Overlooked Works of the Spirit

            Pentecostal scholars generally accept that there is a paradigmatic relationship between the life of Jesus in Luke and the life of the church in Acts.[3] Of primary importance is the relationship between the empowerment of the Spirit at Jesus’s baptism (Luke 3:21-22) and the Spirit baptism of the disciples at Pentecost (Acts 2:1-4). The descent of the Spirit at Jesus’s baptism prepared Him for, and propelled Him into His mission, and the Spirit baptism at Pentecost does the same for the disciples. Luke’s thesis for Luke-Acts is that if the Spirit of God who anointed Jesus now dwells in the church, then that same Spirit will inform and enable the church to do the same works—in fact, “greater works than these” (John 14:12, ESV)—that Jesus did. So, what are these works that, aided by the power of the Spirit, the church is called to do?

After the empowerment of Jesus at His baptism, we see Him liberating the poor, marginalized and oppressed; delivering people from sin, sickness and evil; and blessing the hungry, the blind and the hurting (Luke 4:18-19; 7:22-23). In sum, Jesus was anointed by the Spirit to break down social, economic, racial and gender barriers and to inaugurate God’s reign of love, justice and shalom in the world. And it is clear that if the church wants to follow the footsteps of Jesus, then it must do what He did under the power of the Spirit. All this is exactly what we see happen at Pentecost and in the subsequent works of the church in Acts.

The prototype of Jesus’s inauguration and ministry anticipated and laid out the trajectory for the “greater works than these” (John 14:12, ESV) of the church, namely, the breaking of barriers and liberation of all peoples through works of justice, equality, inclusion and demarginalization.[4] As Michael Wilkinson and Steven Studebaker highlight, we have often focused on the charismatic manifestations of Acts 2/Joel 2 at the expense of the social message and liberating work of the Spirit in the text.[5] As we see in Luke-Acts and as we will now see in Pentecostal history, one should always lead to the other.

 

History: Social Dimensions of Early Pentecostalism

            In his teaching and writing, Martin Mittelstadt laments that Pentecostals suffer from “historical amnesia.”[6] This forgetting of our history, combined with the institutionalization and quest for respectability that comes with the growth of a new movement, has led us to overlook the important social dimensions of early Pentecostal history. What we find is a similar pattern to that found in the Spirit-empowered ministry of Jesus and the Spirit-initiated breaking of barriers in Acts. At Azusa, the Pentecostal experience of being baptized in the Spirit overcame gender, ethnic, racial and socio-economic barriers in a way that “re-embodied” the eschatological outpouring of the Spirit on the early church.[7] Early Pentecostal leaders gave thoughtful reflection and passionate action to social issues. They developed careful rationales for resistance, nonviolence and prophetic opposition to systems that catered to the powerful and to agendas that usurped allegiance to the kingdom of God. What Azusa and our Pentecostal history teach us is that the Pentecostal experience leads us to our mission of bringing, binding and reconciling people together—even in a world still tainted by patriarchy, racism, sexism and classism.

 

Theology and Practice: Becoming a Foretaste of Things to Come

Part of the problem facing Pentecostals is that we have not taken the time to develop a thoughtful theology of mission from within the Pentecostal experience itself and therefore have unreflectively borrowed from fundamentalist theology and its sister, dispensational eschatology.[8] Embracing this theology has put us behind in the area of social concern when our Pentecostal experience and understanding should actually be causing us to lead the way![9] Informed by Scripture and history, a Pentecostal theology of mission will consider not only one’s “personal Pentecost,” but also the corporate Pentecostal reality that is in line with the work of the outpouring of the Spirit and its social implications as experienced in Acts and at Azusa. In this way, the initial inward experience of the Spirit immediately pulls us outward—both in our imagination (with regard to eschatological anticipation), and in our participation (with regard to kingdom inauguration). Our call as a Pentecostal people is to be an eschatological community that is a foretaste of the world to come; this is our mission and the “end” toward which we move. But what might this “foretaste” look like? How can we be Pentecostal in practice when it comes to outreach and social action in our particular contexts?

Thankfully, the same Spirit who inspires our beliefs also engages us in practices congruent with those beliefs. The interplay between belief and practice, worship and mission, is best thought of in the church as the rhythm of gathering and dispersion in which union with Christ through the Spirit leads to mission in the world by the Spirit. As pastors, we must continually remind people that communion with the Holy Spirit is not an invitation to escape from this world; rather, the experience of the Spirit is what enables us to better understand the world and to care for it more deeply. The same Spirit who causes us to long for the day when there are no more tears, sorrow or pain is also the Spirit who sends us right into the tears, sorrow and pain of our world. If our Pentecostal worship is not relevant to the issues facing our world, then we will become an “idle faith” which, to use Miroslav Volf’s imagery, “spins in one place, like a tire stuck in an icy hole.”[10] In order to avoid this stagnation, we must invite people not only to experience a foretaste of God’s future kingdom through the Spirit but also to participate in social action and witness that makes the work of the Spirit credible and tangible.

Specific actions for churches are hard to recommend; we need to be open to the creativity of the Spirit who leads us to social action unique to our contexts. But the general principles that inform all Spirit-led outreach are consistent from Jesus to the early church to Azusa to today. We are to be anticipatory, nonconformist, counter-communities that seek God’s salvation, justice and peace by redeeming fallen social structures that are antithetical to the inbreaking of Christ’s rule and reign in the world. The work of the Spirit will cause us to prophetically oppose all forms of racism, classism, sexism, ableism and ageism—any structures that support the “normal” and punish the “abnormal,” profit the rich at the expense of the poor, or favour the “haves” over the “have-nots.” We can do this by resisting unjust legislation, providing interest-free loans to the poor, sharing our possessions, opposing gentrification, aligning with pregnancy care centres, seeking healing and reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, promoting creation care, fighting sex trafficking, exposing economic or environmental exploitation, helping abused women, supporting new immigrants, encouraging equal-opportunity education, advocating for mental health programs, participating in foster care and adoption, and otherwise contributing to endeavours that bring justice, beauty and flourishing to our communities.

How this is fleshed out will be different in Eastern Canada than in the Prairies or the West Coast. Spirit-inspired outreach and works of justice won’t look the same in the Greater Toronto Area or urban centres as they will in the Yukon or rural areas. But as Spirit-led, Spirit-baptized people, we should be at the forefront of these kinds of barrier-breaking endeavours, for we are all called in our social outreach to participate in the eschatological work of the Spirit which becomes a visible witness of God’s love, rule and reign in the world. So let us join together in longing and prayer for the day when our Pentecostal churches, being biblically, historically and theologically informed, are known for outreach and social action that is fuelled by the Spirit of Pentecost and is a foretaste of the world to come.

 

Joseph Lee Dutko (PhD, University of Birmingham) has served as co-lead pastor with his wife at Oceanside Community Church on Vancouver Island, B.C., since 2015, where they live with their four children. He writes at josephdutko.com. This article appeared in the July/August/September 2026 issue of testimony/Enrich, a quarterly publication of The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada. © 2026 The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada. Photos © istockphoto.com.



[1]. An earlier version of this article first appeared in a booklet called Pentecostal Life, distributed as a resource for pastors in the British Columbia & Yukon District of the PAOC.

[2]. Amos Yong, The Spirit Poured Out on All Flesh: Pentecostalism and the Possibility of Global Theology (Baker Academic, 2005), 91ff.   

[3]. Martin W. Mittelstadt, Reading Luke-Acts in the Pentecostal Tradition (CPT Press, 2010), 168-169.  

[4]. Yong defines this relationship between Luke and Acts as the transition from Spirit Christology to Spirit Soteriology (Yong, The Spirit Poured Out, 83-91). See also Murray W. Dempster, “Evangelism, Social Concern, and the Kingdom of God,” in Called and Empowered: Global Mission in Pentecostal Perspective, ed. Murray W. Dempster, Byron D. Klaus and Douglas Petersen (Hendrickson Publishers, 1991), 22-43.  

[5]. Michael Wilkinson and Steven M. Studebaker, “Pentecostal Social Action: An Introduction,” in A Liberating Spirit: Pentecostals and Social Action in North America, ed. Michael Wilkinson and Steven M. Studebaker (Pickwick Publications, 2010), 9.   

[6]. Mittelstadt, Reading Luke-Acts, 168-169.  

[7]. Yong, The Spirit Poured Out, 137.

[8]. For more on the unfortunate rise of dispensational thinking within Pentecostalism and its tendency to tolerate injustice and inequality, see my chapter “The Loss of Eschatology as Authorizing Hermeneutic,” in Joseph Lee Dutko, The Pentecostal Gender Paradox: Eschatology and the Search for Equality (Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2024), 91-129.

[9]. Simon Chan says that our historical association with dispensationalism has led us to develop a “crisis eschatology,” which has had positive results for the mission of evangelism but has caused us to fall behind in the area of social justice. Simon Chan, Pentecostal Theology and the Christian Spiritual Tradition (Sheffield Academic Press, 2000), 15-16.

[10]. Miroslav Volf, A Public Faith: How Followers of Christ Should Serve the Common Good (Brazos, 2011), 23.


This content is provided as a free sample of testimony. Subscribe for full access to the complete magazine.